I’ve mentioned before that one of the best ways to keep track of your longer term or even swing trades is by using the weekly charts. And I know I’ve discussed the EMA 90 and its relationship to the weekly charts to a degree that even frightens me with its obsession. Now I’m going to show you two charts labeled A and B and I’m going to remove all other identifying characteristics because the stock themselves really don’t matter – only the lesson counts. And at then end of the discussion you tell me which one you would rather invest in this week.
First we have A and I show it in a weekly format with its 90-period EMA. The second figure is of the distance A normally travels from its 90-period EMA on the weekly frequency. You can see that A has had a great run lately and seems to be slowing down.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ee2a/7ee2abcc7bbeda3b807ab672147c2915e61da5b4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51965/519659b8795366ae79747e4dcbff4acb39f00626" alt=""
Next we have B illustrated in the same manner. The second figure clearly shows that B has strayed far from the 90-period EMA but the rate of difference is slowing down.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5d2a/d5d2a01b0d3305b6b7b47e0f7b35c16d3108c1f6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b98b/2b98b7f15868f231ef51daf65a92734a87727975" alt=""
The bar charts provide a historical reference for these stocks going out to 2 years ago – you can see clearly how they don’t get too far away from the 90-period EMA and when that distance becomes extended they normally hurry back to the touchstone.
So give a picture of the history with no other information which stock do you think has a higher probability of going up and which might be heading down - A or B?
2 comments:
Great illustration as usual.
For what it's worth, stock B has made me a lot more money than stock A in my life.
History can be a good way to tell the future.
Post a Comment