tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30526901.post5823007806231596175..comments2023-11-02T08:32:05.557-04:00Comments on Filtering Wall Street: EMA 140Marlyn Tradeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11977763395430254850noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30526901.post-70026738395588950062013-05-11T01:43:07.917-04:002013-05-11T01:43:07.917-04:00Interesting post on EMA.Interesting post on EMA.QUALITY STOCKS UNDER 5 DOLLARShttp://www.chicagoillinoisbusinesslist.com/business/5066133.htmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30526901.post-55933717723154975452007-03-23T11:33:00.000-04:002007-03-23T11:33:00.000-04:0052 weeks * 5 trading days = 260 - 9 market holiday...52 weeks * 5 trading days = 260 - 9 market holidays = 251. Not 200.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30526901.post-37383041511030059082007-03-21T11:16:00.000-04:002007-03-21T11:16:00.000-04:00120 seemed to be tracking pretty well!120 seemed to be tracking pretty well!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30526901.post-25785698861693487382007-03-21T11:08:00.000-04:002007-03-21T11:08:00.000-04:00Thanks - I fixed it. Same difference just a littl...Thanks - I fixed it. Same difference just a little further away - maybe 120 is better???Marlyn Tradeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11977763395430254850noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30526901.post-49733688450438514062007-03-21T10:55:00.000-04:002007-03-21T10:55:00.000-04:00Your chart of ALTH is showing EMA120 not EMA140. G...Your chart of ALTH is showing EMA120 not EMA140. Guess that's what ya get for posting at 6:48 a.m. Good grief man, get some sleep! :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30526901.post-43551132077235733492007-03-21T09:11:00.000-04:002007-03-21T09:11:00.000-04:00Thanks, s. That's very helpful.Thanks, s. That's very helpful.L.J.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16467256190821479129noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30526901.post-42726646292362761782007-03-21T08:29:00.000-04:002007-03-21T08:29:00.000-04:00@ Bullish JimI tested it with higher volume stocks...@ Bullish Jim<BR/>I tested it with higher volume stocks and it acts fine.<BR/>Use Marlyn's criteria, i.e. stock price 15-35$ and average volume(90) > 500000.<BR/><BR/>The tiny stocks just give better bang for the buck.shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17267063438044982991noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30526901.post-45605497199970232132007-03-21T08:20:00.000-04:002007-03-21T08:20:00.000-04:00Just curious if you tested it with higher volume r...Just curious if you tested it with higher volume required. I hate those tiny volume stocks. If not I'll tinker with it this morning and see if volume makes a difference.L.J.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16467256190821479129noreply@blogger.com